Source-code WCAG 2.1 AA remediation and a settlement-grade conformance report — delivered inside your 90-day window.
No pitch. We tell you what your scope actually is.
In January 2025, the Federal Trade Commission ordered accessiBe to pay $1 million for claiming its AI widget would automatically make websites WCAG-compliant. The FTC found it failed on the basics — navigation menus, form fields, image descriptions.
More than 800 businesses running that widget were sued anyway.
Modern settlement agreements now name overlay vendors directly and state they do not satisfy remediation. Many require you to remove the widget you paid for.
If you installed a widget to prevent this, you were sold a subscription, not a defense.
Read your agreement. It almost certainly requires:
Your lawyer handles the legal strategy. Your developer handles Liquid and CSS. Neither one produces the compliance record that closes this out.
That record is what we build.
We will not tell you this makes you lawsuit-proof. Nobody can, and the FTC has now fined a company for implying it.
What we will tell you is exactly what we tested, exactly what we fixed, exactly what remains, and exactly what it would cost to close the remainder. In writing. Dated.
That document is worth more to your attorney than any guarantee.
Tell us about your situation. We'll review your website, identify your highest-risk accessibility issues, and send you a written scope assessment within 48 hours. No call required.
Your developer can fix the code. That's not the same as producing a conformance record that satisfies a settlement agreement. WCAG remediation requires testing with assistive technology, documenting every success criterion, and producing a report structured for opposing counsel — not just making the site work in a scanner.
We work alongside your developer. They implement the fixes. We provide the scope, the testing, and the evidence.
No. Nobody can guarantee that, and the FTC has now fined a company for implying it could. What we provide is a documented conformance record that demonstrates good faith remediation — which is exactly what your settlement asks for and what your attorney needs in hand.
Modern settlement agreements now name overlay vendors directly and state they do not satisfy remediation requirements. Many settlements require you to remove the widget entirely. If you installed an overlay, you were sold a subscription, not a defense. We can assess whether your overlay creates additional exposure and advise on removal as part of the remediation scope.
This isn't a website fix. It's a legal compliance deliverable. The Emergency Remediation Sprint includes a manual WCAG 2.1 AA audit with assistive technology testing, source-code remediation across up to 25 templates, a third-party app triage, a Conformance Evidence Report written for opposing counsel, and a full remediation log — completed in 21 calendar days.
For context: a single ADA web accessibility lawsuit can settle for $5,000–$25,000, plus attorney fees. Non-compliance with a settlement can trigger additional litigation. The cost of the evidence is a fraction of the cost of the exposure.
We currently accept 2 remediation engagements per month. After the scope assessment, if we're a fit and you're ready to proceed, we typically begin the audit within 3–5 business days of engagement. The Emergency Remediation Sprint runs 21 calendar days from kickoff.
If your settlement window is shorter than 90 days, tell us on the scope assessment and we'll assess whether we can meet it.
The Emergency Remediation Sprint covers up to 25 templates or page types. If your site is larger, we scope the engagement during the scope assessment. Larger sites are quoted based on template count and complexity. We will not under-scope your project to fit a price — that would produce an incomplete evidence record, which defeats the purpose.
Yes. The Conformance Evidence Report is written to be handed to opposing counsel, and we coordinate with your attorney on scope, documentation format, and delivery requirements specified in your settlement agreement. We can work directly with your counsel or through you — whichever your attorney prefers.
We do not provide legal advice. We provide the technical conformance record your attorney needs to close the matter.